Hi,

On 14.08.2013 03:31, Songhaibin (A) wrote:
> In –diagnostics draft, we have timestamp that is used by the
> intermediate nodes to check if the message is expired or not. It raises
> a problem of time synchronization. I think we need a decision from the
> WG. We need careful consideration on how to use the timestamp because
> time synchronization is a barrier in open Internet environment, while in
> a managed environment, it may be less of a problem. Do we want to
> enforce the time synchronization or do we want to lose the feature to
> check the message expiration (and one-way-delay)? Please tell what you
> are thinking about.

As the base (RELOAD) draft doesn't require any time synchronization
mechanism, I think, it's not useful to enforce the use of
time synchronization in any other draft. IMHO it's obvious
that you may have advantages if time synch is available;
more important is how you could distinguish from the protocol
if it's used or not.

Regards,
 Roland

_______________________________________________
P2PSIP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip

Reply via email to