I have marked as Verified. I wonder if this is the shortest time from publication to erratum?
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 7:17 PM, RFC Errata System <[email protected] > wrote: > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6940, > "REsource LOcation And Discovery (RELOAD) Base Protocol". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6940&eid=3885 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Technical > Reported by: Cullen Jennings <[email protected]> > > Section: 14.9 > > Original Text > ------------- > | Reserved | 0x8000..0xFFFE | RFC 6940 | > > Corrected Text > -------------- > | Reserved | 0x8000..0xFFFF | RFC 6940 | > > Notes > ----- > Clearly there was some confusion and at least one of the authors thought > that 0xFFFE was the largest 16 bit integer when in fact it should have been > 0xFFFF. I would like to thank Pearl Liang for catching this mistake. > > Instructions: > ------------- > This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC6940 (draft-ietf-p2psip-base-26) > -------------------------------------- > Title : REsource LOcation And Discovery (RELOAD) Base > Protocol > Publication Date : January 2014 > Author(s) : C. Jennings, B. Lowekamp, Ed., E. Rescorla, S. > Baset, H. Schulzrinne > Category : PROPOSED STANDARD > Source : Peer-to-Peer Session Initiation Protocol > Area : Real-time Applications and Infrastructure > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG >
_______________________________________________ P2PSIP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip
