Hi, Thanks for the comments! They have been addressed in the new -12 revision of the draft.
Regards, Jouni -----Original Message----- From: P2PSIP [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Alissa Cooper Sent: 29. toukokuuta 2014 2:15 To: [email protected] Subject: [P2PSIP] AD evaluation: draft-ietf-p2psip-self-tuning-11 I have reviewed this document in preparation for IETF last call. It’s in good shape and I have issued the last call. Below I have a few comments and questions for you to address together with any last call comments. Section 6: "To calculate an appropriate stabilization rate, the values of three parameters MUST be estimated: overlay size N, failure rate U, and join rate L.” Seems like s/MUST/must/ is appropriate here — the formula for the stabilization rate is essentially infeasible to calculate unless the implementation estimates these parameters in any event. Section 6.3: s/K is set 25%/K is set to 25%/ Section 6.5: It would be useful to have text here or in Section 7 to motivate the choice of 4 as the default value for number-of-peers-to-probe and to note the implications of using a number smaller than 4. Section 8: s/help ensuring/help ensure/ Section 9.1: s/3/0x3/ (for consistency with the IANA registry) Thanks, Alissa _______________________________________________ P2PSIP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip _______________________________________________ P2PSIP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip
