Brian Haberman has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-p2psip-diagnostics-19: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-p2psip-diagnostics/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I agree with Ben and Barry that the "Updates RFC 6940" is not well-justified. I also agree with Joel that the readability makes it hard to completely understand what is being proposed. _______________________________________________ P2PSIP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip
