Dear Spencer, Sorry for the late reply.
> I was slightly surprised by "IANA SHALL" do things. Don't we usually do IANA > considerations without RFC 2119 language? > Thank you for pointing out. We can change it. BR, -Haibin > -----Original Message----- > From: Spencer Dawkins [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2015 10:16 AM > To: The IESG > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-p2psip-diagnostics-19: > (with COMMENT) > > Spencer Dawkins has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-p2psip-diagnostics-19: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email > addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory > paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-p2psip-diagnostics/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > I was slightly surprised by "IANA SHALL" do things. Don't we usually do IANA > considerations without RFC 2119 language? > _______________________________________________ P2PSIP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip
