Jari Arkko has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-p2psip-diagnostics-21: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-p2psip-diagnostics/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for improving the IANA considerations section! However, Section 9.1 still has a bug that IMHO needs to be corrected. The reserved values need to be shifted in value by one, because now you have two with the value 1. As Alexey said: "The draft has improved, however Section 9.1 still seems incorrect: if the first bit is reserved, then the first allocated value must be 2, so all other allocated values should be shifted by 1 bit." However, I have cleared so that the shepherding AD and the WG can take care of this. Please make sure you fix this though, as my understanding is that if you didn't make the change, the protocol would not work as you intended it to work. _______________________________________________ P2PSIP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip
