* Chris Winters ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > FWIW, this is what SPOPS does. Seems to work pretty well, and once > you've made the leap to use tie you've opened up lots of interesting > state maintenance ideas. >
So as you've already had a go at a persistent object system *grins evilly*, do you fancy trying to write a standard ``API'' for this? I'm just pushing this as I think PO systems will be the first real easy gain for P5EE. Greg p.s. for the record my PO stuff is just for my own entertainment / experimentation. -- Greg McCarroll http://217.34.97.146/~gem/
