Hi,

It says in the documentation for Class::Date that it was derived
from Time::Object (from the Time::Piece distribution).

Does anyone know why?
Why was Time::Object not simply extended?

Stephen

At 09:03 AM 11/16/2001 +0000, Matt Sergeant wrote:
>On Fri, 16 Nov 2001, Gerald Richter wrote:
>
>> >
>> > Time::Piece was once into core, but has been retracted now.
>> >
>> Do you know the reasons why ?
>
>Jarkko didn't want to be responsible for defining the "One True Date/Time
>Module", since it's such a religeous issue. So despite it being Larry's
>design, he backed out.


Reply via email to