At 06:01 PM 11/22/2001, brian moseley wrote: >On Mon, 19 Nov 2001, Gunther Birznieks wrote: > > > I think it doesn't really belong in P5EE though but it > > should be part of the standard repetoire of modules > > accepted for use in coding with P5EE (just like the > > date/time discussion except in this case there will only > > be one choice... ) > >right. how about just Data::Properties?
Cool. I like this better than JavaProperties because I think properties are properties and should be language independent. Although it may confuse someone who doesn't know what the properties implementation in Java looks like. It's kind of like the beans vs pearls argument.
