> I totaly agree! Since I am already working on the auto generation for the > mod_perl docs, I have it in mind and anything I do here must also work for > mod_perl, otherwise I will not do it, because I don't have the time to do it > twice.
Great, just make sure to release early and often, then I'll ask less questions when I see what you have on your mind :) >>How about taking perl's approach and devise special semantics for tags? >> >> >> == param >><< == return >>?? == note >> >>I think this will make things even clearer once you get used to these >>(you did get used to perl semantics. don't you love its conciseness now?) > > You get a lot of special characters you need to remember when writing docs. > I personaly don't think that's a good idea, because it's to less verbose, > also it's very compact. On the other hand we don't need many tags. It's just an idea to consider. ________________________________________________________ Stas Bekman JAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide http://perl.apache.org/guide mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://ticketmaster.com http://apacheweek.com http://singlesheaven.com http://perl.apache.org http://perlmonth.com/
