On Jan 18, 2008, at 10:47 AM, Andreas Mock wrote:
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager <[email protected]
>
Gesendet: 18.01.08 08:26:13
An: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
<[email protected]>
Betreff: Re: [Pacemaker] PE-Engine-Processing
No need to apologize, lmb and I just need to get our stories
straight :-)
I'll continue to also answer pacemaker/crm questions on linux-ha but,
personally, I'd prefer questions to be sent to this list.
Particularly since not everyone will be using the heartbeat stack
anymore.
I agree with Lars to not seperate the HA community when not necessary.
I agree in theory, _but_
- it doesn't seem appropriate to hijack the heartbeat mailing list for
use by people not using heartbeat (ie. the openais guys)
- threats of censorship have been made in the past
- the heartbeat mailing list has already been shut down once because
someone didn't like what they saw
I just want to know where to post to. You know some guys don't like
crossposting.
nod, personally though it doesn't bother me so much.
Just take a guess. If you send it here and it's more of a heartbeat
question, we can just bounce it to the heartbeat list.
Generally speaking though, if it involves XML, then this is the right
place :-)
Oh, and if you have a question about a specific component (eg. the
lrmd is using a lot of CPU), try to use the list for the relevant
project (http://clusterlabs.org/#Architecture)
In answer to your original question, yeah, there will have been some
errors earlier on that might make this particular input "interesting"
to an admin/debugger at a later point.
So it saves it as pe-warn-* (instead of pe-input-*) and logs that
message.
My initial question is not completely answered. Probably I simply
don't understand. ;-)
The log entry is saying: Hey guy, there's something which caused a
warning
in the PE. I save this in pe-warn-* for you.
O.K. so far so good. But when I look at this file and put it through
crm_verify I
can't see any messages which would explain why the initial warning
was issued.
Ah.
crm_verify doesn't do a full simulation (because it doesn't always
have the status section, I need to make it smarter at figuring out
when it does), so it doesn't always catch everything.
try ptest instead... that will do exactly what the pengine process does
So, where do I have to look at to see what caused the warning
message in the log.
further back in the log... try grepping for "pengine.*WARN:"
_______________________________________________
Pacemaker mailing list
[email protected]
http://list.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
