> but 0 is a valid value - and possibly the most likely one to be set > and that strcmp looks wrong to me > > > i'll apply a modified version of this, but i don't want to get too > hung up trying to detect every possible value a hostile admin could > throw at the cluster (especially when they can just as easily use > cibadmin to achieve the same result). > > for 1.0 we'll be using relax-NG schemas (instead of DTDs) for > validation which will allow us to catch more things like this > centrally (on the server) and reject them (and defining what is a > valid 'score' is one thing I've already done :-).
Ok, I understand that this behavior would be better in 1.0. We have to check RELAX NG for now. Thanks! Thanks, Junko _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list [email protected] http://list.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
