I think you need to back up a bit and simply state what you're trying to achieve.
- How many nodes? - How many apps? - How many apps will users interact with directly? (This gives a good indication of how many IPs you need) - Do the apps talk to each other? - Will apps be accepting requests on more than one node at a time? (If so, only then do you need to involve CLUSTERIP) 2009/4/5 Infos E-Blokos <in...@e-blokos.com>: > Hi Andew, > > after read all the possible doc, > I have yet some misunderstood of the IP mechanism : > > Example : > > Primarly I had one serveur that offer all services as > web,mail,db,perl apps etc... > I planned to upgrade my system as a cluster with at least > low latency and cloning(?) since some apps I developped > ask a lot of connections and cpu load. > So I concluded that a cluster with 4 clones were necessary (maybe I'm wrong) > a short describe of my machine config : > - iptables that filter and route a public subnet of 27 ips to 27 local > subnet ips (10.10.10.0/24) from eth0 to eth1 > - apache configured to accept 10.10.10.0/24 subnet for websites in port 80 > and 443 > My question is do I need one other ip public subnet for and change the local > ips of every website on every node to avoid > ip conflict between nodes ? > I understood the CLUSTERIP concept, but not the real ips configuration of > each clone node. > > Thanks for your help > > Franck > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. > _______________________________________________ > Pacemaker mailing list > Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker > > _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker