On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 7:03 PM, Steven Dake <sd...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Fri, 2009-05-22 at 11:42 -0500, Karl Katzke wrote: >> > Karl, >> > >> > we are closing in on the final days of openais and corosync versions >> > 1.0. >> > >> > Regards >> > -steve >> >> So? When will we see some stable, well-documented configurations that aren't >> supported and tested by only one specific vendor? >> >> -K >> >> > > Karl, > > I assume vendors will start to pick up corosync 1.0 and openais 1.0 > after its released and begin to support it then. The timeline for > openais-0.80.3 to be fully supported and widely distributed took several > years. > > I wouldn't expect this big delay for Corosync since the code base is > similar. I expect the transition to Corosync will be rapid once > pacemaker is ported to it and its proven itself to be stable. If you > want to help, I recommend asking your OS vendor to support Corosync in > their products.
Assuming testing goes well, Novell will likely ship it in SP1 of HAE for SLES11 (man, what a mouthful that is). _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
