On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 11:35 PM, Mark Hamzy <ha...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> I believe that general purpose solutions that follow standards should > live in pacemaker. Just returning to this for a moment, if it is a truly general purpose solution, then it could be useful for those not running Pacemaker. So if we're talking about a daemon, then unless its pacemaker-specific or needs pacemaker to compile, then it really should go in with the other resources (we'll have some announcements regarding where resources are kept "soon"). _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
