On 10/03/2009 10:48 AM, Simon Horman wrote: >> There is _no guarantee_ that the staging repositories will always be up >> to date with the latest and greatest found at hg.linux-ha.org or >> hg.clusterlabs.org. Those willing to contribute patches to Pacemaker, >> Agents, Glue or Heartbeat should _not_ pull from hg.linbit.com, but from >> the original repositories instead. > > Would it make sense to maintain these changes in the > hg.linux-ha.org and hg.clusterlabs.org trees?
The idea was to provide a staging ground for Debian-related changes. That is to say, once the new Debian build infrastructure stabilizes, Andrew and Dejan pull into the upstream trees. Then from that point forward, Debian-specific changes can be committed first into Martin's trees, so Debian users can test them before they hit upstream. It's all just intended to be a means of facilitating collaborative Debian-specific package maintenance. Make sense? Cheers, Florian
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list [email protected] http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
