hi, On 10/30/2009 01:20 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote: > I think this is a two phase feature for the PE: The first phase is what > you propose - make sure we do not overload any given node, basically > implementing hard limits. > > The second phase would be for the PE to actually try to "optimize" > placement, and try to solve the constraints imposed by the utilization > versus capacity scores to a) place as many resources as possible > successfully, and b) to either spread them thinly (load distribution) or > condensed (load concentration, think power savings by being able to put > some nodes to sleep).
i just want to let you know that i think that this is a marvelous addition to pacemaker! cheers, raoul -- ____________________________________________________________________ DI (FH) Raoul Bhatia M.Sc. email. r.bha...@ipax.at Technischer Leiter IPAX - Aloy Bhatia Hava OEG web. http://www.ipax.at Barawitzkagasse 10/2/2/11 email. off...@ipax.at 1190 Wien tel. +43 1 3670030 FN 277995t HG Wien fax. +43 1 3670030 15 ____________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
