On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 7:06 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree <l...@suse.de> wrote: > On 2009-10-30T16:41:34, Andrew Beekhof <and...@beekhof.net> wrote: > >> >> This does not make any sense. Sorry, let me try again. >> >> >> >> res1 start = set attribute >> >> res1 stop = delete attribute >> >> >> >> rule for res2 with -inf score if attribute is set. >> > >> > better, just give all your nodes an attribute with the same value and >> > use a colocation constraint with a score-attribute (IIRC) >> >> sorry, s/score-attribute/node-attribute/ > > The problem with this obviously is that the attribute is not removed if > res1 has been fenced.
Whats that matter? The point is that node-attribute=xyz performs (anti-)colocation based on attribute "xyz" _instead_ of the implied #uname. _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
