On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 1:01 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic <deja...@fastmail.fm> wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:38:47PM +0100, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 11:47 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic <deja...@fastmail.fm> >> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 11:37:48AM +0100, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> >> Anyone else interested in this feature being added? >> > >> > The configuration is not explicitely given to the cluster, but >> > placed in a file. What happens on next startup? Who removes the >> > file so that the cluster doesn't load it again? If the answer to >> > the last question is "the admin", I'm against the feature. >> >> As I understand it, the intention is that the cluster always loads it. >> I personally would have no use for such a feature[1], but it seems to >> be a recurring theme so I'm reluctantly considering it. >> >> [1] It really only has an effect if the entire cluster is down anyway. > > Consider this: The static init cib is stored, the user starts the > cluster and waits anxiously for the configuration to load, it's > loaded yeah!, but there's a problem with resource x, let's see > where's the issue, reading a few thousand lines of log, aha!, > there it is, fixed, works!, great, everybody happy, everybody > forgets about the static init cib; then next month there's a new > release, put resource in not managed mode, stop cluster, upgrade, > start cluster, load static init cib. That is bound to happen. > What's wrong with cibadmin -C? Or crm configure load replace? One > can even load from an url.
I'm not disagreeing, I'm just saying that this is how the feature is intended to work (and trying to gauge the interest in it). _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
