On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Michael Schwartzkopff <mi...@multinet.de> wrote: > Am Freitag, 5. Februar 2010 12:03:44 schrieb Andrew Beekhof: > >> Nothing there looks even remotely relevant. >> Its also highly unlikely that I managed to make a change that >> resurrected the exact same symptom from 1.0.5 (which I also did >> nothing to actually fix - except add logging thats not been triggered >> here). > > Fully agree. I cannot explain myself. Perhaps a new bug? > >> What does the cluster do if you manually set a value for >> expected-quorum-votes? Does the value stay set in the CIB or get >> erased? > > the value stays in the CIB but is not evaluated for the quorum descision.
shouldn't matter. as i said, the corosync plugin already had the right value. > >> I can't imagine that its influencing quorum either. >> This is the only line indicating a value change, and its set to the >> correct value: >> >> Feb 4 21:22:22 debian2 corosync[6221]: [pcmk ] info: >> update_expected_votes: Expected quorum votes 1024 -> 2 >> >> Strange > > Very strange, indeed. > > -- > Dr. Michael Schwartzkopff > MultiNET Services GmbH > Addresse: Bretonischer Ring 7; 85630 Grasbrunn; Germany > Tel: +49 - 89 - 45 69 11 0 > Fax: +49 - 89 - 45 69 11 21 > mob: +49 - 174 - 343 28 75 > > mail: mi...@multinet.de > web: www.multinet.de > > Sitz der Gesellschaft: 85630 Grasbrunn > Registergericht: Amtsgericht München HRB 114375 > Geschäftsführer: Günter Jurgeneit, Hubert Martens > > --- > > PGP Fingerprint: F919 3919 FF12 ED5A 2801 DEA6 AA77 57A4 EDD8 979B > Skype: misch42 > > _______________________________________________ > Pacemaker mailing list > Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker > _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
