Please send emails just once thankyou. On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 6:32 PM, Alan Jones <falanclus...@gmail.com> wrote: > It appears from the code in lib/ais/plugin.c:pcmk_peer_update() that > Pacemaker ignores > transitional membership updates from Corosync. It is my understanding that > this information > tells you which members have maintained synchronized state during > transitions. For example, > view AB on both A and B followed by B alone on B followed by ABC on A would > be proceeded > by a transitional membership to exclude B on A to let A know that B is no > longer in sync. Is it > safe to ignore these messages?
Not only safe but essential, otherwise B would kill A for no reason. Transitional memberships are just corosync's way of saying "i;m still working, but this is what I have so far". > How is the CIB replicated? Thats not related to the above question is it? _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
