On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 06:58:30AM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote: > On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 11:10:31PM +0800, Martin Aspeli wrote: > > Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: > >> ocfs2 introduces an extra level of complexity. You don't want > >> that unless really necessary. > > > > How would that complexity manifest? > > Have you noticed the number of extra daemons and kernel bits that have to be > running in order for OCFS2 to work? Do you know what each of those parts > does, what it's likely failure modes are, where it logs to, how to diagnose > which bit has gone wrong, exactly what has happened, and how to recover?
Yes, something along those lines. Dejan > - Matt > > _______________________________________________ > Pacemaker mailing list > Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker