2010/3/17 <renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp>: > Hi Andrew, > > Please give my question an answer.
I've been extremely busy. Sometimes I defer more complex questions until I have time to give them my full attention. > > Best Regards, > Hideo Yamauchi. > > --- renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote: > >> Hi Andrew, >> >> Thank you for comment. >> >> I asked next question before. >> >> http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/pacemaker/61484 >> >> I guessed from your this answer. >> When I use cib.xml of the answer of before, is the limitation that it >> combined a start of >> clnPingd >> with after a node rebooted unrealizable? I don't really understand the question here. >> >> Limitation of before : >> > <rsc_colocation id="rsc_colocation01-1" rsc="UMgroup01" >> > with-rsc="clnPingd" score="1000"/> >> >> This limitation : >> > <rsc_colocation id="rsc_colocation01-1" rsc="UMgroup01" >> > with-rsc="clnPingd" score="INFINITY"/> >> >> Is there a description method of cib.xml letting both limitation function at >> the same time? What would that achieve? _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
