On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 9:41 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic <deja...@fastmail.fm> wrote:
> colocation not-together -inf: d1 d2 d3 I think there is a problem with this syntax, particularly for +inf. Consider: colocation together1 inf: d1 d2 This means d1 must run where d2 is. But if I add d3: colocation together1 inf: d1 d2 d3 Now the original constraint is reversed and d2 must run where d1 is (think of how groups work). (Unless you're modifying the order). I think we need: no brackets: exactly 2 resources must be specified () brackets: a non-sequential set [] brackets: a sequential set _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
