On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 3:10 AM, <renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp> wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > Thank you for comment. > > It is difficult for me to illustrate by English.
np :-) Maybe it would be easier to show the logs and/or crm_mon output with and without the patch. > > This patch is a considerably special demand of our user. > > Even if an STONITH resource duplicated, node and STONITH done STONITH of are > that the log of the node > to do wants to output it by warning. > > ============ > Last updated: Thu Jul 29 09:58:36 2010 > Stack: openais > Current DC: srv01 - partition WITHOUT quorum > Version: 1.0.9-74392a28b7f31d7ddc86689598bd23114f58978b > 2 Nodes configured, 2 expected votes > 2 Resources configured. > ============ > > Online: [ srv01 srv02 ] > > Resource Group: group-1 > prmDummy1 (ocf::heartbeat:Dummy): Started srv01 > stonith0 (stonith:external/ssh): Started srv01 > > For example, STONITH moves to srv02 when srv01 is done STONITH of in the case > of resource placement > such as the above. > > Our user wanted to change the log of this time. > > However, I understand that it is a very special demand. > > I wish that I get possible to appoint such a special demand with a start > option of Pacemaker if > possible. > > Best Regards, > Hideo Yamauchi. > > > --- Andrew Beekhof <and...@beekhof.net> wrote: > >> 2010/7/29 <renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp>: >> > Hi All, >> > >> > Our user showed a demand in a level of log output after handling of >> > pengine. >> > >> > When STONITH is carried out, pengine wants to output log at a warning >> > level if a repeating >> resource is >> > only an STONITH resource. >> > >> > Because plural STONITH may be started when STONITH is carried out. >> > However, it is because the importance of the problem is different from the >> > plural start of the >> normal >> > resource. >> >> I'm having trouble understanding the purpose of this patch... >> >> If the only resource on a node to be fenced is a stonith resource, and >> that resource is also running on another node, then unset >> "was_processing_error"... is that right? >> >> Why do that? >> >> > >> > I wrote the patch which operated a was_processing_error flag to answer the >> > demand of our user. >> > >> > This patch may be considerably special. >> > I do not think that all users need this patch. >> > >> > Please talk to me an opinion for this patch. >> > >> > Best Regards, >> > Hideo Yamauchi. >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org >> > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker >> > >> > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org >> > Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf >> > Bugs: >> > http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker >> > >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org >> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker >> >> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org >> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf >> Bugs: >> http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker > > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org > Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf > Bugs: > http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker > _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
