On 29 October 2010 10:25, Andrew Beekhof <and...@beekhof.net> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 8:15 AM, Pavlos Parissis
> <pavlos.paris...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 28 October 2010 22:55, Andrew Beekhof <and...@beekhof.net> wrote:
>>> Its released already, but the wrong packages got built because I ran
>>> the wrong command :-(
>>> Fedora 13 packages are uploading now, I'll do opensuse 11.3 in the morning
>>
>> I have seen the tag on Mercurial but I haven't seen any rpm on
>> rpm-next for EPEL and I thought  you are still testing the release.
>> When do you expect to have the builds for EPEL?
>
> There wont be unfortunately.
> Some of the changes we needed to make involved the use of
> g_hash_table_get_values() which only appeared in glib 2.14
> So EPEL5 is stuck on the 1.0 series.

Does that mean I shouldn't use 1.1.x (x<4) on EPEL? I guess not since
the change you mentioned is only in 1.1.4
I currently use 1.1.3 on EPEL 5.4

Cheers,
Pavlos

_______________________________________________
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker

Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker

Reply via email to