On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 7:41 AM, Chris Picton <ch...@ecntelecoms.com> wrote: > I have attached the output as requested
Normally it would get balanced, but its being pushed to 01 because there are so many resources on 02 sort_node_weight: slb-test-02.ecntelecoms.za.net (12) > slb-test-01.ecntelecoms.za.net (2) : resources So the cluster is trying to balance out the resources, just not at the level you were expecting. > On Thu, 11 Nov 2010 11:21:51 +0100, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >>>> what version is this? >>> >>> >>> This is 1.0.9 >> >> Odd. I wouldn't have expected this behavior. Can you attach the >> output >> from cibadmin -Ql please? >> >> >>>> On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 5:51 PM, Chris Picton >>>> <chris-spl7aieqiqkiqcj4vrx...@public.gmane.org> wrote: >>>>> From a previous thread (crm_resource - migrating/halt a cloned >>>>> resource) >>>>> >>>>> Andrew Beekhof wrote: >>>>>> bottom line, you don't get to chose where specific clone instances >>>>>> get placed. >>>>> >>>>> In my case, I have a clone: >>>>> primitive clusterip-9 ocf:heartbeat:IPaddr2 \ >>>>> params ip="192.168.0.9" cidr_netmask="24" \ >>>>> clusterip_hash="sourceip" nic="bondE" \ op monitor >>>>> interval="30s" \ >>>>> meta resource-stickiness="0" >>>>> >>>>> clone clusterip-9-clone clusterip-9 \ >>>>> meta globally-unique="true" clone-max="2" \ >>>>> clone-node-max="2" resource_stickiness="0" >>>>> >>>>> When I start the clone, both instances start on the same node: >>>>> >>>>> Clone Set: clusterip-9-clone (unique) >>>>> clusterip-9:0 (ocf::heartbeat:IPaddr2): Started >>>>> slb-test-01.ecntelecoms.za.net >>>>> clusterip-9:1 (ocf::heartbeat:IPaddr2): Started >>>>> slb-test-01.ecntelecoms.za.net >>>>> >>>>> The second node has a colocated set of standalone IP addresses >>>>> running, so I assume that pacemaker is pushing both clusterip > clones >>>>> to the second node to balance resources. >>>>> >>>>> My scores look like (0 for everything to do with this resource) >>>>> clone_color: clusterip-9-clone allocation score on >>>>> slb-test-01.ecntelecoms.za.net: 0 >>>>> clone_color: clusterip-9-clone allocation score on >>>>> slb-test-02.ecntelecoms.za.net: 0 >>>>> clone_color: clusterip-9:0 allocation score on >>>>> slb-test-01.ecntelecoms.za.net: 0 >>>>> clone_color: clusterip-9:0 allocation score on >>>>> slb-test-02.ecntelecoms.za.net: 0 >>>>> clone_color: clusterip-9:1 allocation score on >>>>> slb-test-01.ecntelecoms.za.net: 0 >>>>> clone_color: clusterip-9:1 allocation score on >>>>> slb-test-02.ecntelecoms.za.net: 0 >>>>> native_color: clusterip-9:0 allocation score on >>>>> slb-test-01.ecntelecoms.za.net: 0 >>>>> native_color: clusterip-9:0 allocation score on >>>>> slb-test-02.ecntelecoms.za.net: 0 >>>>> native_color: clusterip-9:1 allocation score on >>>>> slb-test-01.ecntelecoms.za.net: 0 >>>>> native_color: clusterip-9:1 allocation score on >>>>> slb-test-02.ecntelecoms.za.net: 0 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Is there a way to request pacemaker to try split the clones up if >>>>> possible over the available nodes? >>>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>> >>>>> Chris >>>>> >>>>> > > > _______________________________________________ > Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker > > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org > Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf > Bugs: > http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker > > _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
