On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 4:51 PM, Andres Rodriguez <andres.rodrig...@canonical.com> wrote: > Andrew > > Thanks for the info. > >> >> Yes. This is what SLES does and will presumably continue to do. >> >> Err, assuming the patches are still in there. >> >> I just checked, they're not. >> So if you want the non-cman version, you need to restore the pacemaker >> pieces. >> > > Just how my understanding was. > >> > >> > Right. I asked because SLES currently builds from Cluster 3.0.x sources >> > iirc, which do include the .pcmk variants -- question was whether it was >> > OK to build from current versions that just have the "standard" >> > controld. Based on your answer I assume it is. >> >> It is, but you'd need cman in that case. >> Personally I find it very disappointing that the pacemaker variant was >> removed from the source just because Fedora no longer planned to >> build/package it. > > Indeed. This creates a dependency on cman, when many were happy not > having to use it.
I'd welcome a dlopen() patch that made it a soft dependency :-) Its a very minor dependency though - cman itself is tiny and mostly replaced by corosync. _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
