This should now be fixed in: http://hg.clusterlabs.org/pacemaker/devel/rev/960a7e3da680
Its based on your patches but is a little more generic. On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 10:22 PM, Yuusuke IIDA <iiday...@intellilink.co.jp> wrote: > Hi, Yan > > After trying your correction , I had the following problems. > > * When trouble happened in a resource below the top of group , it did not > come in fail over in the node that intended. > > I attach crm_report when a problem occurred. > > I tried a correction again. > > The patch which I attached traces it to a lower resource of group and gets > score. > > Is there any problem with this correction? > > Regards, > Yuusuke > > (2011/07/07 21:45), Gao,Yan wrote: >> >> Hi Yuusuke, >> Thanks a lot for the report and the patch! >> >> I somewhat prefer simplifying the policy, like the attached patch. >> >> What do you think about it? Could you please give it a try? >> >> Regards, >> Yan >> >> >> On 06/30/11 16:36, Yuusuke IIDA wrote: >>> >>> Hi, Yan >>> >>> I wrote a patch for Pacemaker-dev to solve this problem. >>> >>> I want you to confirm the patch. >>> >>> I want a repository to merge it if there is not a problem. >>> >>> Best Regards, >>> Yuusuke >>> >>> (2011/06/20 16:10), Yuusuke IIDA wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, Yan >>>> >>>> I wanted to scatter transition of the group resource, however failed. >>>> >>>> * Initial state >>>> Online: [act1 sby1 sby2] >>>> Full list of resources: >>>> Resource Group: grp1 >>>> rsc1 (ocf::pacemaker:Dummy): Started act1 >>>> Resource Group: grp2 >>>> rsc2 (ocf::pacemaker:Dummy): Started act1 >>>> Resource Group: grp3 >>>> rsc3 (ocf::pacemaker:Dummy): Started act1 >>>> >>>> * When I let you break down in order of grp1 -> grp2 -> grp3. >>>> Online: [act1 sby1 sby2] >>>> Full list of resources: >>>> Resource Group: grp1 >>>> rsc1 (ocf::pacemaker:Dummy): Started sby1 >>>> Resource Group: grp2 >>>> rsc2 (ocf::pacemaker:Dummy): Started sby2 >>>> Resource Group: grp3 >>>> rsc3 (ocf::pacemaker:Dummy): Started sby1 >>>> >>>> * When I let you break down in order of grp3 -> grp2 -> grp1. >>>> (there is a problem) >>>> Online: [act1 sby1 sby2] >>>> Full list of resources: >>>> Resource Group: grp1 >>>> rsc1 (ocf::pacemaker:Dummy): Started sby1 >>>> Resource Group: grp2 >>>> rsc2 (ocf::pacemaker:Dummy): Started sby1 >>>> Resource Group: grp3 >>>> rsc3 (ocf::pacemaker:Dummy): Started sby1 >>>> >>>> As for this, will not it be right like primitive resource to be >>>> dispersed >>>> transition? >>>> >>>> I attach hb_report when a problem happened. >>>> >>>> Best Regards, >>>> Yuusuke >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org >>>> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker >>>> >>>> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org >>>> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf >>>> Bugs: >>>> http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker > > -- > ---------------------------------------- > METRO SYSTEMS CO., LTD > > Yuusuke Iida > Mail: iiday...@intellilink.co.jp > ---------------------------------------- > > > _______________________________________________ > Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker > > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org > Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf > Bugs: > http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker > > _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
