On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 5:10 PM, Marco van Putten <marco.vanput...@tudelft.nl> wrote: > >> >> I don't believe there is any need for additional RPMs. Pacemaker >> should already be in CentOS6 > > > For example we're running Redhat on an academic licence and don't have a > subscription for the HA channel. It would be very welcome to have RPM's from > Clusterlabs.
After some discussions with various interested parties, I've written up the situation and some possible solutions on the wiki: http://clusterlabs.org/wiki/RHEL _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
