On 09/08/2011 01:18 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > Sorry, but there's just no way anything like this is going to be > accepted in fedora, rhel or upstream. > If the packaging of cluster-glue-libs is too granular, the correct > approach is to create additional subpackages - not to copy half of the > project into pacemaker.
OK thanks Andrew. Yes I agree that's a better approach. At least the proof of concept SRPM helps define where this split might be made. cheers, Pádraig. _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
