Hi all. Now in the pacemaker documentation you propose to use CMAN instead of the pacemaker crm for the gfs2 ( http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/en-US/Pacemaker/1.1/html/Clusters_from_Scratch/ch08s02.html ). But in the google cache we can find the next link - http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/en-US/Pacemaker/1.1/html/Clusters_from_Scratch/ch08s03.html
What does this mean? Does pacemaker:controld solution is'n stable? Can we go production with this in the Centos 6.0? Tnx -- Viacheslav Biriukov BR http://biriukov.com
_______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
