28.10.2011 04:04, Nick Khamis wrote: > Hello Everyone, > > I just want to make sure this is still the case before I go through > with it. I am trying to setup an > active/active using: > > Corosync 1.4.2 > Pacemaker 1.1.6 > Cluster3 > DRBD 8.3.7 > OCFS2 > > The only reason I installed Cluster3 was for dlm support. Fencing > would be handled by stonithd. > Is there any reason I need to fully install and configure two cluster > managers. Defining nodes in > both cman and corosync/openais?
You may look at http://www.mail-archive.com/pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org/msg09959.html That message contains Andrew's dlm_controld patch for shortening fencing path - it now talks directly to stonith subsystem, rebased for 3.0.17, and some fixes to make it all compile. Some work should probably be done to make it apply/compile on latest cluster3. That way I eliminate cman from stack (except some dlm-related libs) and run cluster with stable fencing on top of corosync/openais. Best, Vladislav _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
