On 11/03/2011 12:38 PM, Lars Ellenberg wrote: > On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 07:23:01PM +0900, 池田 淳子 wrote: >> Hi, >> >>>> location rsc_location-1 msDRBD \ >>>> rule role=master -inf: \ >>>> (defined master-prmMySQL:0 and master-prmMySQL:0 gt 0) or \ >>>> (defined master-prmMySQL:1 and master-prmMySQL:1 gt 0) >>> >>> Why not using two rules for this location constraint? I expect that to >>> work the same way you want to express in your rule above. >> >> Do you mean the following rules? >> >> location rsc_location-1 msDRBD \ >> rule role=master -inf: defined master-prmMySQL:0 and master-prmMySQL:0 gt 0 \ >> rule role=master -inf: defined master-prmMySQL:1 and master-prmMySQL:1 gt 0 > > I may be missing something obvious, but why not a colocation constraint > between msDRBD and prmMySQL? > > something like > colocation asdf -inf: msDRBD:Master prmMySQL:Master > > >
I don't think you miss something obvious, lars ;-) yes, that constraint you recommend would be the way to go ... I was only commenting on the parenthesis not on the quality of the rules ;-) Regards, Andreas -- Need help with Pacemaker? http://www.hastexo.com/now
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
