Yes.

P.S. Dont remove the mailing list from the recipients. Bad etiquette :-)



Sent: Thu Dec 01 2011 14:50:21 GMT-0700 (MST)
From: Charles DeVoe <scarecrow...@yahoo.com>
To: Patrick H. <pacema...@feystorm.net>
Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Fedora 16 Cluster
That document says to remove the pacemaker plugin. Should I start pacemaker as a service?

--- On *Thu, 12/1/11, Patrick H. /<pacema...@feystorm.net>/* wrote:


    From: Patrick H. <pacema...@feystorm.net>
    Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Fedora 16 Cluster
    To: "Charles DeVoe" <scarecrow...@yahoo.com>,
    pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
    Date: Thursday, December 1, 2011, 4:22 PM

    Yes, the original documentation you came across that talks about
    CMAN :-)
    
http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/en-US/Pacemaker/1.1/html/Clusters_from_Scratch/ch08s02.html
    Though you dont need the gfs stuff if youre not going to be using gfs



    Sent: Thu Dec 01 2011 14:00:44 GMT-0700 (MST)
    From: Charles DeVoe <scarecrow...@yahoo.com>
    </mc/compose?to=scarecrow...@yahoo.com>
    To: Patrick H. <pacema...@feystorm.net>
    </mc/compose?to=pacema...@feystorm.net>
    Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Fedora 16 Cluster
    Is there some documentation on how to set up option 3?

    corosync + cpg + cman + mcp

    Do I simply start up pacemaker????
    Also, what is cpg?

    --- On *Thu, 12/1/11, Patrick H. /<pacema...@feystorm.net>
    </mc/compose?to=pacema...@feystorm.net>/* wrote:


        From: Patrick H. <pacema...@feystorm.net>
        </mc/compose?to=pacema...@feystorm.net>
        Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Fedora 16 Cluster
        To: "The Pacemaker cluster resource manager"
        <pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org>
        </mc/compose?to=pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org>
        Cc: "Charles DeVoe" <scarecrow...@yahoo.com>
        </mc/compose?to=scarecrow...@yahoo.com>
        Date: Thursday, December 1, 2011, 1:52 PM

        Sent: Thu Dec 01 2011 11:34:39 GMT-0700 (MST)
        From: Charles DeVoe <scarecrow...@yahoo.com>
        To: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
        Subject: [Pacemaker] Fedora 16 Cluster
        I've spent the last month or so building linux clusters.  2
        of them in a VM environment on fedora 15.  I went through
the Clusters from Scratch Tutorial; which sort of worked. At this time I am looking for a sanity check.

        My requirements are  to have  a 4 node load balanced cluster
        with shard access to a SAN volume.  The SAN will be using GFS2.

         I believe I need corosync, Openais, PaceMaker, and GFS2
        utilities.

        Where the confusion is coming from is the use of CMAN in the
        clusters from scratch.  It seems from what I am reading that
        Pacemaker should be able to do everything I need and I am
        wondering if the use of cman is old information.

        Any thoughts comments or suggestiosn are greatly
        appreciated, Thanks in advance.

        No, CMAN is the new information. Theres a nasty bug out there
        (see
        
http://www.mail-archive.com/openais@lists.linux-foundation.org/msg05600.html)
        if you setup pacemaker 1.1 without the new MCP stuff. Best
        solution is to switch to CMAN. See
        
http://theclusterguy.clusterlabs.org/post/907043024/introducing-the-pacemaker-master-control-process-for


_______________________________________________
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker

Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org

Reply via email to