On Tuesday 24 January 2012 23:55:57 Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: > On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 09:51:49PM +0100, Arnold Krille wrote: > > Using the same subnet for two communication-rings will disturb corosync > > as it uses multicasts for communication. And that is best done with one > > multicast- channel per subnet. > Newer corosync (at least since 1.4.x, perhaps earlier) can do > udpu instead of multicast. I'd suggest to use that. Ask on the > corosync-discuss list about how to tune for your network.
Last time I checked, using multicasts implied using udp. There is no 1-to-1 endpoint-connection in multicast as you would need for tcp. Maybe you meant the use of broadcasts? That is in fact a thing of the past. a) it pollutes your whole network when you use your "public" network as one of the communication-rings. b) its not available as soon as you use ipv6. Have fun, Arnold
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
