On 03/27/12 10:33, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 2:34 AM, Jiaju Zhang <jjzh...@suse.de> wrote: >> On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 11:50 +0900, Yuichi Seino wrote: >>> Hi Jiaju, >>> >>> I have a question about booth. >>> I would like to know if a redundant structure of arbitrator is possible. >>> If it is possible, Please tell me how to the approach. >> >> If I understand the question correctly, you mean that the arbitrator >> should be redundant in case it might be down. Well, this can be resolved >> by adding more arbitrators, for example, you have 2 sites, and configure >> 3 arbitrators. > > The arbitrator is already redundant isn't it? > Because you need a cluster node to fail before an arbitrator failure > has any ill-effect. I think the term "arbitrator" that Jiaju referred to is the booth daemon running on a single machine, which is added to make sure the amount of booth daemons are uneven number.
Regards, Gao,Yan -- Gao,Yan <y...@suse.com> Software Engineer China Server Team, SUSE. _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
