On 2012-10-02T19:28:28, Andrew Beekhof <[email protected]> wrote:
> > What are the implications of running Pacemaker with dynamic IP nodes? The IP
> > would change on restart and all configuration would be wrong. Can it be done
> > at all?
> Nope. Not because of pacemaker, but the underlying messaging layer
> (heartbeat/corosync) wouldn't be able to find its peer when it comes
> back up.
As long as it's corosync with multicast (and the nodes still being able
to communicate on the mcastaddr), it ought to be possible there.
Mind, it isn't necessarily a great idea, but it should work. I'm not
sure if statically assigned nodeids are going to be more reliable or
not though.
Regards,
Lars
--
Architect Storage/HA
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB
21284 (AG Nürnberg)
"Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde
_______________________________________________
Pacemaker mailing list: [email protected]
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
