On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 18:37:04 +0100 Dejan Muhamedagic <deja...@fastmail.fm> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 05:22:08PM +0100, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote: > > On 2012-11-09T14:06:29, Dejan Muhamedagic <deja...@fastmail.fm> > > wrote: > > > > And also doesn't really help with getting the state/readiness of > > > > services the guest might provide. > > > Isn't it that one gets a login prompt only once the host reached a > > > certain run level? > > Services may start in the background. The console may either be > > text, graphical, or network only. > Hmm, I have yet to see a Linux/UNIX host without a console. And > that means quite some time ;-)
While (almost) all systems have some kind of console, not all systems stay at a text-console during runtime. If you want to watch a linux-terminal-server, its not a text-console that is the primary screen. And then watching the text-console for a login:-prompt tells you that the machine is up. "Pressing" enter tells you that the login-process is still answering. But that doesn't tell you whether the webserver on that machine is still working correctly. Its not even telling you if the machine is reacting to network stuff. All it tells you is that some kind of system is started. So its actually only a little more then "virsh list |grep <machinename>" tells you. Imho watching the console for monitoring a machine is as useless as it can get. Have fun, Arnold
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org