Hi Jiaju,
2013/2/22 Jiaju Zhang <jjzh...@suse.de>:
> On Wed, 2013-02-20 at 16:26 +0900, Yuichi SEINO wrote:
>> Hi Jiaju,
>>
>> I am testing this patch.
>> When a lockfile was removed, it seems that the stop of RA isn't a
>> intended behavior.
>
> I'm just curious how the lockfile was removed. Basically the existence
> of the lockfile shows one boothd is started, and prevent being wrongly
> started again. So the lockfile should not be removed intentionally by
> the admin.
I used how to run "mv" to the pid file.
The other case also is the same situation. When we already run
"boothd -l other.pid" on node, the lockfile exists in the other place.
So, $lockfile doesn't exist in the start and stop of RA.
I think that it is better to take account of the existence of
lockfile or $pidnum, because /proc/cmdline may happen to fulfill this
if. For example, anything RA includes the check if pid is the empty.
anything_status() {
if test -f "$pidfile"
then
if pid=`getpid $pidfile` && [ "$pid" ] && kill -s 0 $pid
then
return $OCF_SUCCESS
else
# pidfile w/o process means the process died
return $OCF_ERR_GENERIC
fi
else
return $OCF_NOT_RUNNING
fi
}
>
> Thanks,
> Jiaju
>
Sincerely,
Yuichi
--
Yuichi SEINO
METROSYSTEMS CORPORATION
E-mail:seino.clust...@gmail.com
_______________________________________________
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
