On 11/06/2013, at 2:33 AM, Andreas Mock <andreas.m...@web.de> wrote:
> Hi all, > > I couldn't find a definitive source stating that > a corosync/pacemaker/cman cluster must follow the > rule: uname -n == node-name (== DNS-name of communication-IP) In older versions this is true (an artefact of our heartbeat heritage). However we have been chipping away at that in 1.1.9 and I am currently running corosync 2.x with pacemaker 1.1.10-rc4 and node-name != uname -n > > Can someone give a hint for related documentation? > > The question arises when you want to configure a > cman based cluster (cluster.conf) having a uname -n > equal to the DNS-name of the external ip address but > whant to route the cluster communication over > the internal IP-adresse (cluster interconnect). > I couldn't find a solution that doesn't use the > DNS-names of the internal ip-addresses as node-names. > > Hints and rules welcome! > > Best regards > Andreas Mock > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker > > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org > Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf > Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org