On 07/02/2013 04:14 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: > On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 12:18:23PM -0400, Digimer wrote: >> On 07/01/2013 08:19 AM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: >>>> Well its possible right now, it "just" not super pretty to configure. >>> I already set "Important" IMAP flag on that message and really willing >>> to copy that into my internal wiki ;) >> >> This might be of use (note that I wrote it, not Andrew, so blame me for >> mistakes/typos). >> >> http://clusterlabs.org/wiki/Fencing_topology > > This is really very complex. Do you expect that somebody would > get that right? Doesn't fencing, as the ultimate mean to retain > sanity in the cluster, qualify for the keep it simple principle? > > Cheers, > > Dejan
With proper documentation, yes, they should be able to get it right. Can it be simpler? Sure! I am certain that, if enough people use dual-PDU fencing, Andrew will decide it is worth the effort to simplify the pacemaker configuration. Until then, this works. -- Digimer Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/ What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a person without access to education? _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
