Sorry, didn't send this to the list... ----- Forwarded message from "ge...@riseup.net" <ge...@riseup.net> -----
Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2013 17:13:25 +0200 From: "ge...@riseup.net" <ge...@riseup.net> To: Digimer <li...@alteeve.ca> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Problem with one drbd dual primary ressource User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Hi, On 13-08-10 20:48:08, Digimer wrote: > There is a DRBD-users mailing list, but I suspect there is a lot of > overlap here. Yeah, I tought so too... > Wrong assumption (though a common one). The idea of a test cluster > is to get things working. Fencing is a _critical_ part of this. When > I started clustering, I made the exact same assumption. I wasted > weeks trying to get even basic stuff working. > > Only when I went back and added fencing did everything start to > work. Please take the time to set it up now! So I did. But, nothing changed. For this scenario there shouldn't be fencing involved at all, right? I just issued crm ressource migrate nfs ha1, which led to the same failure as the last days. However, in the logs now I got: [ 100.995696] block drbd4: Split-Brain detected, 0 primaries, automatically solved. Sync from this node Any ideas? Cheers, Georg ----- End forwarded message ----- _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
