Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552113

Rich Mattes <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[email protected]

--- Comment #3 from Rich Mattes <[email protected]> 2010-01-11 22:57:24 EST 
---
The specfile url should point to libwiiuse.spec now, no?

The wiiuse website says that it's dual-licensed under GPLv3 and LGPLv3, but the
spec only mentions GPLv3.

Mock build works for me (fedora-12-i386)

rpmlint output:
$ rpmlint libwiiuse.spec ../RPMS/i686/libwiiuse-*
libwiiuse.i686: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/libwiiuse.so
libwiiuse.i686: W: no-soname /usr/lib/libwiiuse.so
libwiiuse.i686: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding
/usr/share/doc/libwiiuse-0.12/CHANGELOG
libwiiuse.i686: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding
/usr/share/doc/libwiiuse-0.12/README
libwiiuse.i686: W: one-line-command-in-%post /sbin/ldconfig
libwiiuse.i686: W: one-line-command-in-%postun /sbin/ldconfig
libwiiuse-debuginfo.i686: E: empty-debuginfo-package
libwiiuse-devel.i686: W: no-documentation
libwiiuse-examples.i686: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/wiiuse-example
libwiiuse-examples.i686: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/wiiuse-sdl
libwiiuse-examples.i686: W: no-documentation
4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 10 warnings.


The %post problems are easy to fix with
%post -p /sbin/ldconfig
%postun -p /sbin/ldconfig

The wrong file-end-of-line-encoding can be fixed with dos2unix.  The rest could
be because of the build system

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to