Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551722 Remi Collet <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Remi Collet <[email protected]> 2010-01-24 10:43:09 EST --- REVIEW * no source files (channel.xml match latest upstream) * package meets naming * package must meet packaging guidelines * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license (of the packages provided by the channel). * license is open source-compatible (BSD). * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide). * package installs properly * channel (un)registered properly * rpmlint (warnings are ok) : php-channel-phpmd.src: I: checking php-channel-phpmd.noarch: I: checking php-channel-phpmd.noarch: W: no-documentation 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. * final provides are sane: php-channel(pear.phpmd.org) = 1.3 php-channel-phpmd = 1.3-3.fc8 + final requires /usr/bin/pear php-pear(PEAR) * %check is not present; no test suite provide. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets are OK (pear channel..) * no documentation * %install start with rm * %clean ok ***** APPROVED ***** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
