Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551912

Christian Krause <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
                 CC|                            |[email protected]
         AssignedTo|[email protected]    |[email protected]
               Flag|                            |fedora-review?

--- Comment #3 from Christian Krause <[email protected]> 2010-01-24 13:06:43 EST 
---
I've roughly scanned over the package and I've seen a couple of issues. It
would be good if they could be fixed first before I do the full complete
review:

- source files differ from upstream and the source URL does not match the link
on the download page:
http://ftp.novell.com/pub/mono/sources/monodevelop-java/monodevelop-java-2.2.tar.bz2

- License: it looks like that the source files and the COPYING file points to
GPLv2+ instead of MIT - please can you check this?

- package does not build (x86_64):
Looking for required packages
Checking for package 'mono-addins'.. found.
Checking for package 'gtk-sharp-2.0'.. ERROR: Package named 'gtk-sharp-2.0' >=
2.12.8 not found.
Try adjusting your PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable.
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.d20ndr (%build)
RPM build errors:

- directory %{_libdir}/monodevelop/AddIns/JavaBinding must be packaged

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to