Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=554101 --- Comment #20 from Christoph Wickert <[email protected]> 2010-01-25 13:17:04 EST --- (In reply to comment #18) > The current situation is that surf is fedora incompatible. Perhaps it will > never be fedora compatible, but you say I have to rename it to $(whatever), > because a 3rd party repo could package surf. Sorry but this argumentation > doesn't look sane to me and I can't find this kind of argumentation in the > guidelines. Jason already quoted the important bits from the guidelines: "We don't just try to avoid conflicts with existing packages within Fedora but also potential conflicts." Not only with existing packages in Fedora -> also 3rd party -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
