Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508750 --- Comment #11 from Christoph Wickert <[email protected]> 2010-01-26 09:22:35 EST --- (In reply to comment #10) > Note, for example, that Debian uses the name "trash" for the executable of > this > very package, and Debian has at least as many naming-conflict concerns as > Fedora: Not sure if Debian actually has a guideline for naming conflicts. Debian happily uses "Conflicts:" http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-conflicts while Fedora tries to avoid it whenever possible: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Conflicts > http://packages.debian.org/lenny/all/trash-cli/filelist > Ubuntu also calls it "trash": > http://packages.ubuntu.com/jaunty/all/trash-cli/filelist If Debian uses it, Ubuntu will use it too. ;) > If there are eventually multiple programs named "trash", we can make them > alternatives and invoke the alternatives setup. We don't use alternatives that much in Fedora. I suggest to stick with trash-put, but on the other hand I wouldn't really mind trash. Should be up to the maintainer I think. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
