Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 --- Comment #37 from Chen Lei <[email protected]> 2010-01-28 13:14:42 EST --- (In reply to comment #36) > Well, I don't know which changelog you are talking about but the version jogl > 1.1 tarball has both gluegen and jogl together. > You can create separate packages of them without any problems. > If you are talking about jogl 2.0, it is still a dev version and there are > several problems with it: > * a lot of changes occurred in the API > * the last modifications on jogl git are three months old. > * there is not ETA on the release of a stable version (I tried a few time to > contact upstream about that and about contributing to jogl but I never > received > any answer) > For all these reasons, jogl 1.1 should be packaged first. If so, I think we can create a jogl1 package instead of jogl to push jogl 1.1 to the fedora repo like qt3 and qt(qt4). What is the version of gluegen that included in jogl 1.1 tarball? > About the prerequirements, I don't know any dependencies of Scilab using > jing.jar or jimi.jar ?! There is a Prerequirements to compile Scilab 5.2.0 from scilab's site. See http://www.scilab.org/download/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
