Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=554090 Jussi Lehtola <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola <[email protected]> 2010-01-31 07:15:43 EST --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > I'm fairly sure I remember seeing a requirement that the Group: tag come > > from > > the official list in /usr/share/doc/rpm-*/GROUPS, but I can't find that in > > the > > packaging guidellines now, and the Sugar packaging guidelines use > > Sugar/Activities just as you have, so I guess that's allowed. That statement is in the Creating Packages HOWTO. I don't think that there is an official guideline about this. Since the Group: tag doesn't have much meaning anymore as comps are used in package selection, instead, you really should use standard RPM groups, as you will get unnecessary rpmlint warnings if you don't... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
